Terry

Rigged

43 posts in this topic

dustbin3    2

SJAAK is right. The reason you see so much crazy stuff is because people play really loose with fake money and therefore more hands get made and a lot more suckouts happen.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Docheadshot    0

Bad beats happen all the time, but for people to play this game for more than a month then say that there not are waaaaay too many odd defying suckouts, they are delusional or in on it. Lol.  IJS...If you are all in against the big stack, don't be shocked to see runner-runner for the suck-out on the river...no matter how far they are behind.  It happens at least 75% of the time and they are usually so odds-defying that you have to have a drink afterwards. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sweetd31    12

My anecdote for when I feel I am on a bad luck streak or feeling that the game has "selected" a winner is to buy stuff for my character. Find a balance of stockpiling chips and putting them towards items. After all you can't lose outfits and table items in a ring match. :)

 

That strategy actually works in real life too, when at a casino and your up, go buy dinner or put it towards your bill. Then go gamble with what you got left, you'll be a far happier gambler. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Farmer John40    161

Back in the days of nickel mechanical slots and  $2 blackjack, I'd drive from  San Francisco to the casinos of Reno.  When I stayed for a couple of days and won enough to pay for gas, room, meals and a show. I considered it a win-win.

After a blackjack hand the dealer would discuss the odds of the game just played and pit-bosses would join the conversation. 

Different times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warp    135
On 28.9.2016 at 11:48 PM, Terry said:

I hardly ever see a win with just a high card and been playing for over a month I'm level 252. Someone always has something just for bidding wars. Just today I've seen 3 runners where someone would only need one card but hey there's always that flush possibility on the table. I see it constantly it's rigged and I'm sure others will agree

Perhaps you don't know that winning by high card is less likely in Texas hold'em than winning with a pair. In other words, getting a high card is less likely than getting a pair.

It's ironic that a pair is considered "better" than a high card, even though a pair is more likely to happen, but it was decided a long time ago that Texas hold'em would have the same hand rankings as all other poker formats.

So someone winning with a high card is actually a relatively rare circumstance, according to the probabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zanatoo    118
1 hour ago, Warp said:

Perhaps you don't know that winning by high card is less likely in Texas hold'em than winning with a pair. In other words, getting a high card is less likely than getting a pair.

It's ironic that a pair is considered "better" than a high card, even though a pair is more likely to happen, but it was decided a long time ago that Texas hold'em would have the same hand rankings as all other poker formats.

So someone winning with a high card is actually a relatively rare circumstance, according to the probabilities.

You have a 48.7% chance of pairing by the river and a 51.3% chance of NOT hitting a pair.  

There's not much in it, but to say that a pair is more likely, is not true. 

Edited by Zanatoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warp    135
1 hour ago, Zanatoo said:

You have a 48.7% chance of pairing by the river and a 51.3% chance of NOT hitting a pair.  

There's not much in it, but to say that a pair is more likely, is not true. 

According to this, there's a 43.8% chance of getting a pair, and a 17.4% of getting no pair. Even getting two pair is more likely, at 23.5%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zanatoo    118
4 hours ago, Warp said:

According to this, there's a 43.8% chance of getting a pair, and a 17.4% of getting no pair. Even getting two pair is more likely, at 23.5%.

ahh yes, but that's including hands where the pair (or two pair) occurs anywhere within the 7 cards in play, ie. it includes hands where the board pairied. I'm talking only of hands where one of your two hole cards makes a pair with the board.

As it's harder to hit a pair than to not hit one, it's correct that a pair should rank higher than no pair (high card). 

It's an interesting topic though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a poker professional, seems the tournies arent rigged, rather weak players willing to call with anything at lower levels. You see this in real life at low buyin and/or rebuy tournies.

The ring games, however, are highly suspicious.

If you play high stakes, watch for a player or two at the table that seem to have a rediculous reading ability, almost knowing what cards you have without having watched you play over time. 

Same player(s) is usually provisional or low level, and gets miraculous cards at a unbelievable rate when the chips are in.

Sucks, since I thought Prominence would be a fun hobby site for me. 

Anyone arguing, let me ask you this. Where are hand histories? Why not implement them? I won't be spending another dime until this issue is addressed.

Edited by UntameableAnge1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear, I am not saying the RNG is rigged. I am also not saying Prominence is placing 'master accounts' that can see hole cards or control cards in ring games. 

I am just warning other players to be wary on high stakes ring games (500k+), that something just doesn't seem quite right.

I just don't know where to point, since selling chips doesn't seem like it's a big business to anyone, except Prominence.

Hand histories, more qualifications to join higher stake ring games (such as requirement to finish provisionals, more provisionals to begin with [seven instead of three]), more options on joining ring games (such as level requirement), would not only deter cheaters (if that's the problem) - but also showcase the fact that you do realize there's an issue, and you are trying to be completely transparent.

I find it pretty hard to believe that there's lots of players that are going to get the game for pretty much free, then spend $50-$100 just to buy a mill+ chips, skip tournies completely (which showcase more skill then ring games), then use a huge portion of their bankroll to play high stakes, then happen to have X-Ray vision, and were born on Saint Patrick's Day to boot.

Edited by UntameableAnge1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warp    135

As a "poker professional" you should know that sometimes it's relatively easy to read people just by their betting behavior (when and how they check or bet, and even how fast they are doing so when their turn comes).

When I play, I take it as a challenge to guess people's hole cards, by observing how they bet. Sometimes I get it surprisingly right (although, sadly, way too often the round doesn't go to showdown). In some situations it's really easy to guess at least one of their cards (at least the rank).

If you think somebody's hacking the system to get hidden information, you should provide more proof than just a hunch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tim Madsen    7

I know its poker and bad beats happen all the time but dam. How many times have ive seen bottem hand getting crush suck out on the river today its almost unreal. 6 time in a row where the worst hand going in won and it seems it always AK - 10 3  A nd you just know a 3 will pop up on the river. Or  runner runner runner flush . I know when im all in and have qq kk  i think im going to lose when i see someone calll with a 56 lol  or like my last hand  88 guy goes all in 42  you know it trip 2s lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tim Madsen    7
11 hours ago, Warp said:

Any video evidence of that?

Lol no sorry i dont take vids of my games. But  whatever im  just saying what ive seen. I realize  its fake money and ppl well and do play anything. It just when you see crazy shit happening all the time it makes you wonder. Last night to start off a game the first 4 hands had pairs on the flop. There is like a 16% chance  of a pair on the flop im guessing 4 in a row is way way under 1% . Maybei m just having a bad day at the tables lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warp    135

I don't see "crazy shit happening all the time". Either the game is targeting you specifically (unlikely), or you are seeing patterns where there are none (more likely).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now